Buying and Selling a Winery: What to Know Before You Start with Erik McLaughlin, Managing Partner at Metis
Erik McLaughlin spent his career as a winery operator before he became an M&A advisor. He was at a winery when it was acquired by a large publicly traded wine company, and after that experience his phone did not stop. Everyone he knew in the wine business wanted to know how they had done it. He recognized that demand was real, that there were a lot of winery owners who wanted exits and had no idea how to approach them, and he built Metis to fill that gap. The firm now specializes specifically in wine industry mergers and acquisitions.
He sat down with Lauren Heindel to walk through what is actually happening in winery M&A in 2025: which deals are getting done and why, what drives sellers and buyers to the table, how wineries are valued, what preparation looks like before a sale, and what actually determines whether an acquisition succeeds after the papers are signed.
The wine industry’s current landscape, characterized by oversupply, shifting consumer habits, and reduced West Coast tourism, has made M&A more complicated than it was during the growth years. But deals are still getting done, and understanding which deals, and why, gives winery owners on both sides of the table a much clearer picture of what is realistically achievable.
In this episode, we cover:
The three types of winery deals that are currently getting done in a soft market, and how "puzzle piece fits" are driving most of the activity
The primary motivations for sellers (generational transition, distress, capitalizing on success) and what buyers are actually looking for
The valuation frameworks used in winery M&A: EBITDA multiples, asset-based valuation, discounted cash flow, and how vineyard value is treated separately
Why getting advisors involved a year or two before a sale, not at the point of decision, is the most common mistake sellers make
What "clean financials" actually means for a winery going to market, and why most wineries do not have them yet
How post-merger integration typically works, including the "glide path" model for founder involvement and why both parties need to approach it with humility
The three types of deals getting done right now
The wine industry M&A market in 2025 is more selective than it was during the expansion years, but it is not stalled. Erik’s framework for what is currently transacting identifies three distinct categories, and understanding which one applies to your situation is the first step in any realistic conversation about a deal.
The first category is what Erik calls A-plus businesses: wineries that are highly profitable, well known, and genuinely exceptional. These can command strong valuations in any market environment because there are always buyers for them. The caveat is that truly A-plus businesses are rare, and many winery owners who think they are in this category are operating at a level below it. Most A-plus businesses also have no particular reason to sell in a soft market, so even though deals are possible, the supply of these transactions is limited.
The second category is opportunistic deals, where assets are priced aggressively enough that buyers come to the market even for properties they might otherwise pass on. These transactions happen because something in the seller’s situation requires them to move, whether financial distress, personal circumstances, or timing pressure. The outcomes for sellers in this category tend to be less satisfying, but the deals get done.
The majority of the deals that we have done over the last two years are what we call puzzle piece fits, where there is a particular buyer for whom a specific acquisition opportunity is a uniquely good fit and there aren't really good substitutes for it, where it fits their objectives so uniquely well that they're willing to pay a fair valuation in a soft market.
Erik McLaughlin , Managing Partner
Metis
The puzzle piece fit category is the most interesting and the most demanding. These are transactions where a specific buyer and a specific seller align in a way that justifies a fair price even when the market is soft. A DTC-heavy brand that fills a distribution company’s portfolio gap. A Pinot Noir producer in Oregon that completes a California-focused multi-winery operation. The match has to be genuine and specific, and there is often no plan B if the primary buyer does not come through. Making those matches is, as Erik puts it, the magic of how you deal-make in a challenging market.
Before engaging with an M&A advisor, have an honest conversation with yourself about which category your winery falls into. A-plus valuations require genuinely exceptional profitability and brand strength, not just a well-run business. If your winery is not clearly in that category, puzzle piece fit is likely the most realistic path to a fair valuation, and finding the right buyer requires identifying who specifically would benefit most from what your winery offers.
What drives sellers and buyers to the table
For sellers, the most common driver by a significant margin is generational transition. Founders or second-generation owners reach a point where they are no longer able or interested in running the operation, there is no next generation ready to step in, and the management team is not strong enough to sustain the business without them. For many of these sellers, the majority of their net worth is tied up in the winery, and a successful exit means a comfortable retirement. Erik describes this as the most gratifying work his firm does.
Distress is the second driver, and it has become more prevalent. Struggling wineries are bringing more sellers to market, but distress does not automatically mean a deal is possible. Many distressed sellers who come to Metis are told directly that there is not a solution the firm can offer them, because the asset or business conditions do not support a transaction at a valuation the seller would find acceptable.
A lot of founders have been really good at taking a winery from zero to 25,000 cases, but they don't know how to go from 25,000 to 50,000. That's a different game. And a lot of large wine companies are really good at taking something from 25 to 50,000, but not very good at taking it from zero to 25,000. So there's a driver where people have created a successful business, but the skills and resources to take it to the next level is a different kind of company.
Erik McLaughlin , Managing Partner
Metis
For buyers, the motivation is growth and profitability. The lifestyle buyer exists in the market, but the significant majority of deals that actually close are businesses buying businesses with a specific strategic rationale. Portfolio diversification is a common thread: a company strong in distribution looking for a high-DTC brand, a California-focused operation expanding into Oregon, a red wine specialist filling out a white wine portfolio. Buyers are looking for something that addresses a gap, not just a wine business they could also run.
If you are a seller entering an M&A process, think through the categories of buyers who would have the most strategic reason to want your specific business: your channel mix, your geography, your price point, your brand profile. The buyer who has the most to gain from acquiring you specifically is also the buyer most likely to pay a fair price in a soft market. That list may be shorter than you think, which is one reason finding the right advisor matters.
How wineries are valued
Winery valuation is not a single formula, and the framework that applies to a profitable operation is different from the one that applies to a business whose asset value exceeds its earnings value. Erik walks through the most common methods his firm uses, typically running multiple in parallel to triangulate before giving sellers guidance on realistic price ranges.
The primary earnings-based method is a multiple of EBITDA: earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. This strips out financing decisions, tax structures, and accounting treatment to get at the raw economic output of the business, then applies a multiple based on market comparables. Vineyards are treated separately in this analysis because they generate significant asset value without contributing commensurately to EBITDA. Erik’s firm models them at real estate value as if they were arm’s-length from the winery operation, which sometimes requires normalizing financials for the transfer pricing of internal fruit.
If a winery is not making money or not making a lot of money, oftentimes the value of the stuff, just the pure asset value, is actually greater than the value of the enterprise based upon its earnings. And frankly, that's the case for more than half of the wineries out there.
Erik McLaughlin , Managing Partner
Metis
For wineries that fall into the asset-value-exceeds-earnings scenario, the valuation is not a multiple of earnings but a cumulative assessment of what the inventory, equipment, buildings, land, and vineyards are actually worth. And if the earnings are not sufficient to support those assets, the business value may even be a discount off the face asset value, because capital is tied up in a business that is not generating enough return to justify it. This is a conversation that many winery owners have not had and are not expecting, which is one reason Erik recommends getting into valuation conversations well in advance of any actual transaction.
If you have not done a formal valuation of your winery in the last three years, your understanding of what a buyer would pay is probably based on assumptions rather than analysis. Requesting a valuation conversation with an M&A advisor before you are ready to sell, not the week you decide to move forward, gives you time to understand the gap between what you think your business is worth and what the market will tell you.
Why preparation starts years before the sale
The most consistent mistake Erik sees sellers make is waiting too long to bring in advisors. People assume that M&A advisors only want to be involved once the business is ready to go to market, and they do not want to waste anyone’s time before that point. Erik’s perspective is the opposite: talking to potential advisors a year out is good, two to three years out is better, because the preparation required to get a winery ready for a successful exit takes time that most sellers have not budgeted for.
The financial preparation is significant. Buyers and professional investors require clean financial statements, and the reality, which consistently surprises sellers, is that most wineries do not have them. This is not a matter of dishonesty in the books. It is that the cost accounting is often incomplete, the chart of accounts has not been structured for outside review, and normalizing the financials to what a buyer’s diligence team will expect takes months of work.
The legal preparation is equally important and equally overlooked. Deals hang up or fail over legal issues that could have been resolved in advance: unregistered trademarks, unfinalized conditional use permits, unpermitted waste treatment systems, and other compliance gaps that show up during diligence and suddenly become obstacles to closing.
Bring your accountant, your lawyer, and any M&A advisors you are considering working with into the process early. We would far prefer to talk to a client a year, or even better two or three years, in advance of an exit so we can help put them on a plan. And we're happy to be patient for when the process actually starts.
Erik McLaughlin , Managing Partner
Metis
Once a deal reaches the acceptance-of-offer stage, the real work begins. Diligence is a full reveal: there are no secrets once a buyer has accepted a letter of intent. Having financial and legal records in order before that process starts determines how smoothly it goes. Erik’s guideline on timeline is realistic: most deals target 60 days to close and take 60 to 90. Deals that were expected in February sometimes close in June.
Start with your financials at least a year before you think you will go to market. Specifically: get your cost accounting right, get your chart of accounts organized, and understand what your EBITDA looks like on a normalized basis, meaning with personal expenses backed out and transfer pricing adjustments made. The financial picture that matters to a buyer is often different from the one that matters for tax purposes, and creating that buyer-ready version of your financials takes more time than most sellers expect.
What determines whether a merger actually succeeds
Closing a deal is not the end of the work. Post-merger integration is where the strategic rationale either delivers on its promise or breaks down, and the variables that determine the outcome are as much human as operational.
The most critical factor is how the seller’s ongoing involvement is structured. Erik describes a typical framework as a “glide path,” starting with full-time involvement for the first year, stepping down to half-time for the second, and to minimal involvement by the third. The step-down is intentional: at some point, a founder’s continued presence in the operation slows the organizational change the buyer needs to implement. But moving too fast to remove the founder creates a different problem, because the buyer loses access to the institutional knowledge and relationship capital that made the acquisition valuable in the first place.
The buyer's gonna have their own ideas about how to run things, and the founder needs to be respectful of that. And similarly, the founder's gonna have a lot of insights and know where all the bodies are buried, and understand the culture and the mechanics of the business in a way that the buyer has a limited amount of time to glean. Being able to take advantage of that period of time that the founder is involved is really the key. But it's definitely a delicate dance.
Erik McLaughlin , Managing Partner
Metis
The failure mode Erik describes most vividly is the buyer who moves too fast to assert control without asking enough questions, realizes the founder is gone, and then discovers there were things they needed to know and no longer have access to. The mirror failure is the founder who stays too long, remains too involved, and prevents the new ownership from making the changes that the acquisition was intended to enable. The middle path requires both parties to approach the transition with humility and genuine interest in learning from each other, which is harder in practice than it sounds.
Before closing, have an explicit conversation with the buyer about what knowledge transfer looks like, not just how long the founder will stay, but what specifically needs to be documented and transferred. Relationships with distributors, institutional knowledge about vineyard blocks, context about why certain operational decisions were made, the tacit knowledge a founder carries is hard to identify in advance, which is why the glide path exists. Starting that documentation process before close, not during it, protects both parties.
Watch or listen to the full episode on YouTube | Spotify | Apple Podcasts.
For more conversations like this, subscribe to Expert Talks and join The Punchdown, InnoVint’s online community for wine professionals.
Frequently Asked Questions about Buying and Selling a Winery
How are wineries valued for sale? +
Wineries are typically valued using multiple methods simultaneously. The most common is a multiple of EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization), which strips out financing and accounting decisions to reflect raw economic output. Vineyards are generally valued separately at real estate value rather than included in the earnings multiple. Asset-based valuation, which sums the worth of inventory, equipment, buildings, land, and vineyards, is applied when a winery's asset value exceeds what its earnings would support in an EBITDA framework. For more than half of wineries, asset value is greater than enterprise value based on earnings, which affects what a buyer will pay and how a transaction is structured.
What types of winery deals are currently getting done? +
In the current soft market, three types of transactions are closing. The first is A-plus wineries, which are highly profitable and well-regarded businesses that can command strong valuations regardless of market conditions. These are rare. The second is opportunistic deals, where assets are priced aggressively enough that buyers act even on distressed or time-sensitive opportunities. The third and most common is what Erik McLaughlin calls puzzle piece fits: strategic acquisitions where a specific buyer has a uniquely strong alignment with a specific seller's brand, channel mix, geography, or price point and is willing to pay a fair valuation because the strategic rationale is compelling enough.
What drives winery owners to sell? +
The primary driver is generational transition: founders or second-generation owners reaching a point where continued ownership is no longer practical, with no family succession plan in place. The business often represents the majority of the owner's net worth, making a successful exit the foundation of their retirement. Financial distress is a second driver, though distressed sellers do not always find buyers at acceptable valuations. A third driver is capitalizing on success: founders who have built a business to a certain scale but lack the resources or operational profile to take it further, and who recognize that a larger buyer could build on what they have created.
What should a winery do to prepare for a sale? +
Preparation should start at least one to two years before going to market. The most important steps are getting financial statements into market-ready condition (clean cost accounting, organized chart of accounts, normalized EBITDA that removes personal expenses and adjusts for internal transfer pricing), resolving legal issues in advance (registered trademarks, finalized use permits, compliant waste treatment), and engaging legal, accounting, and M&A advisors early rather than waiting until the decision to sell is final. Most wineries do not have financial statements that are ready for buyer diligence without significant cleanup, and that work takes longer than sellers expect.
What happens after a winery is acquired? +
Post-merger integration is typically structured with the founding owner staying involved on a declining basis over one to three years, a model Erik McLaughlin calls a glide path. This allows the buyer to access the institutional knowledge, relationships, and operational context the founder holds while gradually transitioning full control. The most common failure modes are buyers who move too fast and lose access to critical knowledge before it can be transferred, and founders who stay too long and slow the organizational changes the new ownership needs to implement. Successful integrations require both parties to approach the transition with humility and a genuine interest in learning from each other.